
Over the course of several drafts, the core elements of my scripts remain more or less the same. There might be a few changes here and there, but to me, the end result is pretty darn close to what I originally intended.
As part of the development of those drafts, I get notes from trusted colleagues and professional analysts. Everybody has their opinions, of which there were many, and I can pick and choose which ones to use.
I was still presenting my stories the way I wanted to tell them, but is that the way they should be told? Was I falling into the trap of “I’m the writer, so what I say goes! End of discussion!”?
I recently got notes on one of my scripts that offered up some keen insight regarding the antagonist’s storyline. This included the reader’s frustration about what they perceived as a lack of knowing the character’s goal and the reasoning behind it.
At first, that was pretty surprising to hear. But as is usually the case, I took a step back and looked at the big picture, trying to be as objective as possible. Was it really not as apparent as I thought?
And as is also usually the case, their comments were spot-on. I had never made any big changes to how that storyline was written because I saw it as being “just fine the way it is”, which also happened to be the way I wanted it to be.
Which was counterproductive to how the story needed it to be. It wasn’t working within the context of the story itself.
Was it my writer’s ego that prevented me from seeing this through all the previous drafts? Maybe a little. I’ve seen this kind of thing before in other scripts, but just couldn’t see it within my own material.
I knew the script wasn’t perfect, but there’d always been this nagging thought in the back of my mind that it still needed work. Something had to be changed, but I couldn’t identify what. This could also explain why I always felt compelled to keep working on it.
But with those notes, I now had a much firmer grasp of what the reader was talking about, and could begin to rectify the situation.
It took a little time to work through it, including some significant edits and rewrites. It also entailed cutting some scenes that absolutely broke my heart to see them go, but were totally necessary. All part of the process.
I know I’ve said all of this before, but looking through the latest draft, the script really does seem different now – in a better and much stronger sense. The characters, especially the protagonist and antagonist, feel more developed. The story reads as more concrete. I’m very happy with how it turned out.
Once I was able to put what I wanted aside and focus on what was best for the story, it all came together a lot better than I expected. My hope is that this kind of self-analysis will be a bit easier for me to figure out for future drafts of other scripts.
Can’t wait to give it a try.
Hey, old dog – Congratulations on being able to learn a new trick.
woof. now where’s my treat?
Your treat is the moment you get the call, email or text that a producer wants to option or buy your script outright. That will have you wagging your tail for a week. That moment is coming, wait for it… Stay…stay….good boy.
Actually, the ideal would be “Story by” and “Screenplay by” credits. But the $ would be nice too
Do most writer go through what you are going through? Reading what you wrote made me wonder if you were standing on my shoulder. You sound like a carbon version
Great question. Wish I had a good answer. I suppose it takes equal parts confidence and faith in one’s abilities, but also knowing what you don’t know. Another big part is not being afraid to ask for help, but make sure you’re asking someone you can rely on for an honest opinion.